89 John Stones SBC: Here’s Which Version You Should Pick

The 89-rated John Stones “NumeroFUT STONES SBC” card is now available in FC 25 Ultimate Team, priced at 170k coins. Offering versatility, standout defensive PlayStyles, and Manchester City links, this SBC is sparking debate about which version of Stones is better—and whether he’s worth the price. The short answer is yes, but the version you pick depends on how you want to use him. Here’s the breakdown.

John Stones FUT SBC: Playstyles and Versatility

John Stones’ SBC card can play as a center-back (CB), left-back (LB), or CDM, making it a versatile option for your squad. However, he performs best in his natural center-back role.

Each version of Stones comes with different attributes and PlayStyles, which influence how he plays:

• Version 1: This version features the Anticipate+ and Intercept PlayStyles, making it the superior option for intercepting passes and reacting quickly to attacks.
• Version 2: This version emphasizes more physicality with the Bruiser PlayStyle, focusing on aerial dominance and shoulder-to-shoulder challenges. However, it lacks Intercept, which slightly impacts its overall defensive effectiveness.

The Anticipate+ and Intercept combination in Version 1 makes it the better choice for most players, especially those who want a more balanced and effective center-back who can consistently cut out passes and handle defensive pressure.

Chemistry Style: Anchor vs Shadow

Choosing the right Chemistry Style is crucial for maximizing Stones’ performance.

• Anchor Chemistry Style: Best for Stones in the center-back role. It boosts pace, defensive stats, and physicality, while maintaining Controlled acceleration. Anchor allows Stones to play a solid defensive role without being overly reliant on raw speed.
• Shadow Chemistry Style: Improves pace and defensive stats but doesn’t make Stones a Lengthy runner, which might deter players who rely on Lengthy center-backs for counterattacks or open play formations.

For most setups, Anchor is the best option, as it complements Stones’ strengths and offsets his slight pace concerns.

Performance Analysis: Center-Back vs Left-Back

When playing as a center-back, Stones is a standout performer. His 91 Defensive Awareness, 90 Strength, and 91 Reactions make him highly reliable in defensive duels, while his passing stats (87 Short Passing, 85 Long Passing) provide an excellent platform for building out from the back.

In contrast, using Stones as a left-back is less effective. His 82 Pace and right-footed preference limit his contributions as a wide defender, especially in formations where fullbacks need to overlap or deliver crosses. While he can perform as a defensive-minded left-back in a narrow system, players seeking quick and attacking fullbacks will find better alternatives elsewhere.

Meta Formations and Key Gameplay Insights

Stones fits best in meta formations like 4-2-3-1, 5-at-the-back, or 4-4-2, where defensive solidity is essential. Key observations include:

• Defensive PlayStyles: Thanks to Anticipate+ and Intercept (in Version 1), Stones consistently executes clean tackles and intercepts passes effectively, making him ideal in tighter defensive setups.
• Aerial Presence: With 87 Jumping and the Bruiser PlayStyle in Version 2, Stones dominates aerial duels, particularly during set pieces.
• Pace Limitations: Stones’ 82 Pace might feel slightly exposed in open formations where speed is critical for tracking fast attackers.

While both versions can perform well, Version 1’s PlayStyle combination of Anticipate+ and Intercept makes it the stronger overall option, especially for players who rely on interceptions and strong defensive positioning.

Which John Stones Version Should You Pick?

The best version to pick is Version 1, which comes with the Anticipate+ and Intercept PlayStyles. These attributes significantly enhance Stones’ ability to react to attacks, cut passing lanes, and execute clean defensive challenges. This version is perfect for players who value balanced defensive stats and strong AI behavior.

Version 2, with its focus on Bruiser and physicality, can still be effective, particularly if you’re looking for a player to dominate aerial duels or play as a defensive-minded fullback. However, the lack of Intercept PlayStyle makes it slightly less versatile.

Is 89 John Stones SBC Worth the Price?

Yes, the John Stones SBC is worth the 170k coins, especially if you need a reliable center-back with Manchester City or Premier League links. Stones offers excellent defensive stats, strong passing, and unique PlayStyles that make him effective in a variety of formations.

Pairing him with a high-quality defender like Ruben Dias creates a dominant partnership, particularly for players who build out from the back. His versatility as a center-back, left-back, or even CDM adds further value.

That said, Stones isn’t perfect. His pace might feel slightly lacking in certain formations, and he’s less effective as a left-back compared to other options. Additionally, the inability to make him a Lengthy runner with Shadow Chemistry Style may deter some players who prioritize meta builds.

For most players, though, Version 1 of John Stones SBC is the clear winner. It provides a balanced, meta-relevant defender who can hold his own against top-tier attackers.

For a full gameplay breakdown and more insights, check out InceptionFC’s detailed review.

Frequently Asked Questions about NumeroFUT John Stones SBC